As, 4 < 4.0625 < 4.125 < 4.25 < 4.5, therefore three rational numbers between 4 and 4.5 are 4.0625, 4.125, 4.25.
Question 6
Find six rational numbers between 3 and 4.
Answer
The numbers 3 and 4 can be written as 13 and 14.
Since we want to find six rational numbers between the given numbers, multiplying the numerator and denominator of the above numbers by 6 + 1 i.e. by 7, we get 721 and 728, which are equivalent to the given numbers.
As 21<22<23<24<25<26<27<28,721<722<723<724<725<726<727<728
Therefore, six rational numbers between 3 and 4 are:
722,723,724,725,726,727
Question 7
Find five rational numbers between 53 and 54.
Answer
Since we want to find five rational numbers between the given numbers, multiplying the numerator and denominator of the above numbers by 5 + 1 i.e. by 6, we get 3018 and 3024, which are equivalent to the given numbers.
As 18<19<20<21<22<23<24,3018<3019<3020<3021<3022<3023<3024⇒53<3019<32<107<1511<3023<54
Therefore, six rational numbers between 53 and 54 are:
3019,32,107,1511,3023
Question 8
Find ten rational numbers between −52 and 71.
Answer
Writing the given numbers with same denominator 35 (L.C.M. of 5 and 7), we get:
−52=−351471=355
As −14<−13<−12<−11<−10<−9<−8<−7<0<1<2<5,−3514<−3513<−3512<−3511<−3510<−359<−358<−357<0<351<352<355⇒−52<−3513<−3512<−3511<−72<−359<−358<−51<0<351<352<355
Therefore, ten rational numbers between −52 and 71 are:
Writing the given numbers with same denominator 6 (L.C.M. of 2 and 3), we get:
21=6332=64
Since we want to find six rational numbers between the given numbers, multiplying the numerator and denominator of the above numbers by 6 + 1 i.e. by 7, we get 4221 and 4228, which are equivalent to the given numbers.
As 21<22<23<24<25<26<27<28,4221<4222<4223<4224<4225<4226<4227<4228⇒21<2111<4223<74<4225<2113<149<32
Therefore, six rational numbers between 21 and 32 are:
2111,4223,74,4225,2113,149
Exercise 1.2
Question 1
Prove that 5 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 5 be a rational number, then
5=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒5=q2p2⇒p2=5q2....(i)
As 5 divides 5q2, so 5 divides p2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 5m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(5m)2=5q2⇒25m2=5q2⇒5m2=q2
As 5 divides 5m2, so 5 divides q2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 5. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 5 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 5 is an irrational number.
Question 2
Prove that 7 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 7 be a rational number, then
7=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒7=q2p2⇒p2=7q2....(i)
As 7 divides 7q2, so 7 divides p2 but 7 is prime
⇒7 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 7m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(7m)2=7q2⇒49m2=7q2⇒7m2=q2
As 7 divides 7m2, so 7 divides q2 but 7 is prime
⇒7 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 7. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 7 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 7 is an irrational number.
Question 3
Prove that 6 is an irrational number.
Answer
Suppose that 6 is a rational number, then
6=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒6=q2p2⇒p2=6q2....(i)
As 2 divides 6q2, so 2 divides p2 but 2 is prime
⇒2 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 2k, where k is some integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(2k)2=6q2⇒4k2=6q2⇒2k2=3q2
As 2 divides 2k2, so 2 divides 3q2
⇒ 2 divides 3 or 2 divides q2
But 2 does not divide 3, therefore, 2 divides q2
⇒ 2 divides q (Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 2. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, our supposition is wrong. Therefore, 6 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 6 is an irrational number.
Question 4
Prove that 111 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 111 be a rational number, then
111=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒111=q2p2⇒q2=11p2....(i)
As 11 divides 11p2, so 11 divides q2 but 11 is prime
⇒11 divides q(Theorem 1)
Let q = 11m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of q in (i), we get
(11m)2=11p2⇒121m2=11p2⇒11m2=p2
As 11 divides 11m2, so 11 divides p2 but 11 is prime
⇒11 divides p(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 11. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 111 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 111 is an irrational number.
Question 5
Prove that 2 is an irrational number. Hence, show that 3−2 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 2 be a rational number, then
2=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒2=q2p2⇒p2=2q2....(i)
As 2 divides 2q2, so 2 divides p2 but 2 is prime
⇒2 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 2m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(2m)2=2q2⇒4m2=2q2⇒2m2=q2
As 2 divides 2m2, so 2 divides q2 but 2 is prime
⇒2 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 2. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 2 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 2 is an irrational number.
Suppose that 3−2 is a rational number, say r.
Then, 3−2 = r (note that r ≠ 0)
⇒−2=r−3⇒2=3−r
As r is rational and r ≠ 0, so 3 - r is rational
⇒2 is rational
But this contradicts that 2 is irrational. Hence, our supposition is wrong.
∴ 3−2 is an irrational number.
Question 6
Prove that 3 is an irrational number. Hence, show that 523 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 3 be a rational number, then
3=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒3=q2p2⇒p2=3q2....(i)
As 3 divides 3q2, so 3 divides p2 but 3 is prime
⇒3 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 3m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(3m)2=3q2⇒9m2=3q2⇒3m2=q2
As 3 divides 3m2, so 3 divides q2 but 3 is prime
⇒3 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 3. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 3 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 3 is an irrational number.
Suppose that 523 is a rational number, say r.
Then, 523 = r (note that r ≠ 0)
⇒3=25r
As r is rational and r ≠ 0, so 25r is rational [∵ System of rational numbers is closed under all four fundamental arithmetic operations (except division by zero)]
⇒3 is rational
But this contradicts that 3 is irrational. Hence, our supposition is wrong.
∴ 523 is an irrational number.
Question 7
Prove that 5 is an irrational number. Hence, show that −3+25 is an irrational number.
Answer
Let 5 be a rational number, then
5=qp,
where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0 and p, q have no common factors (except 1)
⇒5=q2p2⇒p2=5q2....(i)
As 5 divides 5q2, so 5 divides p2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides p(Theorem 1)
Let p = 5m, where m is an integer.
Substituting this value of p in (i), we get
(5m)2=5q2⇒25m2=5q2⇒5m2=q2
As 5 divides 5m2, so 5 divides q2 but 5 is prime
⇒5 divides q(Theorem 1)
Thus, p and q have a common factor 5. This contradicts that p and q have no common factors (except 1).
Hence, 5 is not a rational number. So, we conclude that 5 is an irrational number.
Suppose that −3+25 is a rational number, say r.
Then, −3+25 = r (note that r ≠ 0)
⇒25=r+3⇒5=2r+3
As r is rational and r ≠ 0, so 2r+3 is rational
⇒5 is rational
But this contradicts that 5 is irrational. Hence, our supposition is wrong.
∴ −3+25 is an irrational number.
Question 8
Prove that the following numbers are irrational:
(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)5+23−5323−72−5
Answer
(i) 5+2
Let us assume that 5+2 is a rational number, say r.
Then,
5+2=r⇒2=r−5
As r is rational, r - 5 is rational
⇒2 is rational
But this contradicts the fact that 2 is irrational.
Hence, our assumption is wrong.
∴ 5+2 is an irrational number.
(ii) 3−53
Let us assume that 3−53 is a rational number, say r.
Then,
3−53=r⇒53=3−r⇒3=53−r
As r is rational, 3 - r is rational
⇒53−r is rational
⇒3 is rational
But this contradicts the fact that 3 is irrational.
Hence, our assumption is wrong.
∴ 3−53 is an irrational number.
(iii) 23−7
Let us assume that 23−7 is a rational number, say r.
Then,
23−7=r⇒23=r+7⇒3=2r+7
As r is rational, r + 7 is rational
⇒2r+7 is rational
⇒3 is rational
But this contradicts the fact that 3 is irrational.
Hence, our assumption is wrong.
∴ 23−7 is an irrational number.
(iv) 2+5
Let us assume that 2+5 is a rational number, say r.
Decimal expansion of 92 is non-terminating repeating.
(iv) 112
∴112=0.1818.....=0.18
Remainder is repeating.
Decimal expansion of 112 is non-terminating repeating.
(v) 133
∴133=0.2307692307.....=0.230769
Remainder is repeating.
Decimal expansion of 133 is non-terminating repeating.
(vi) 400329
∴400329=0.8225
Remainder becomes zero.
Decimal expansion of 400329 is terminating.
Question 3
Without actually performing the long division, state whether the following rational numbers will have a terminating decimal expansion or a non-terminating repeating decimal expansion:
3125 = 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 1 = 55 x 1 = 1 x 55 = 20 x 55 [∵ 20 = 1]
Denominator is of the form 2m x 5n, where m, n are non-negative integers.
∴ The given number 312513 has a terminating decimal expansion.
(ii) 817
The given number 817 is in its lowest form.
Prime factorization of denominator 8:
2228421
8 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 1 = 23 x 1 = 23 x 50 [∵ 50 = 1]
Denominator is of the form 2m x 5n, where m, n are non-negative integers.
∴ The given number 817 has a terminating decimal expansion.
(iii) 7523
The given number 7523 is in its lowest form.
Prime factorization of denominator 75:
355752551
75 = 3 x 5 x 5 x 1 = 3 x 52 x 1 = 3 x 52 x 20 [∵ 20 = 1]
Denominator has a prime factor 3 other than 2 or 5.
∴ The given number 7523 has a non-terminating repeating decimal expansion.
(iv) 156
Both numerator and denominator contain common factor 3. Reducing the number to its lowest form:
156=3×53×2=52
The Denominator 5 = 20 x 51
Denominator is of the form 2m x 5n, where m, n are non-negative integers.
∴ The given number 156 has a terminating decimal expansion.
(v) 6251258
The given number 6251258 is in its lowest form.
Prime factorization of denominator 625:
55556251252551
625 = 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 1 = 54 x 1 = 1 x 54 = 20 x 54 [∵ 20 = 1]
Denominator is of the form 2m x 5n, where m, n are non-negative integers.
∴ The given number 6251258 has a terminating decimal expansion.
(vi) 21077
Both numerator and denominator contain common factor 7. Reducing the number to its lowest form:
21077=7×307×11=3011
Prime factorization of denominator 30:
235301551
30 = 2 x 3 x 5
Denominator has a prime factor 3 other than 2 or 5.
∴ The given number 21077 has a non-terminating repeating decimal expansion.
Question 4
Without actually performing the long division, find if 10500987 will have terminating or non-terminating repeating decimal expansion. Give reasons for your answer.
Answer
GCD of numerator and denominator is 21. Reducing the number to its lowest form:
10500987=21×50021×47=50047
Prime factorization of denominator 500:
225555002501252551
500 = 2 x 2 x 5 x 5 x 5 = 22 x 53
Denominator is of the form 2m x 5n, where m, n are non-negative integers.
∴ The given number 10500987 has a terminating decimal expansion.
Question 5
Write the decimal expansions of the following numbers which have terminating decimal expansions:
Write the denominator of the rational number 5000257 in the form 2m × 5n where m, n are non-negative integers. Hence, write its decimal expansion without actual division.
Answer
The given number 5000257 is in its lowest form.
Prime factorization of denominator 5000:
22255555000250012506251252551
5000 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 = 23 x 54
Hence, denominator of rational number dfrac2575000 in the form 2m × 5n is 23 x 54 where m = 3 and n = 4.